Tag Archives: Books & Authors

On the allure of bad books

I typically put down a book after a single chapter if the narrator’s voice bothers me. But in the past couple weeks I’ve read two books cover to cover that I disliked from the first page: Jonathan Lethem’s The Fortress of Solitude and Ann Cleeves’s Raven Black. Granted, these books belong in two different categories. The first is a literary exploration of Race, Ghetto Fetishism, Art, Superhero-dom, Etc.; the second is a beach thriller set on Scotland’s Shetland Island. But I hated both of them. And yet I kept turning the pages until the end.

As a fiction writer, it can sometimes be enjoyable (in a schadenfreudy way) to read bad fiction. You don’t have to suffer jealousy of great writing. You can spend the time analyzing what you, as an author, would do differently. And you can gloat about being a better writer, even if it’s not true (Is anyone reading me on the beach? No.). You’re reading a book, but the whole time you’re thinking, “I’m reading a book.” I don’t want to read someone’s book; I want to enter another world where the author is invisible and where I’ll learn something worthwhile. But some authors are too good or too bad to disappear into their writing. Jonatham Lethem is a little too good – he writes well, but his voice doesn’t ring true for me. Ann Cleeves is a little too bad – she’s obviously found a story, but not her sea legs.

It’s not the first time I’ve read a disappointing book cover to cover. Sometimes you sense a story that needs to be exposed beneath the surface of poor writing. Sometimes you sense great writing beneath a story that doesn’t need to be exposed. These readable, unreadable books have to be written. They are training wheels. But they say more about the authors than they do about real life. And I suppose I keep reading sometimes because I commiserate with the green authors instead of with their fictional creations.

It’s a paradoxical demand we place on novelists. They must create something utterly fictional, but utterly real. And what horrible pressure: even the worst writer will know immediately if the writing is flawed. We’ve all read many more books than we have written, a statistic which makes us “experts” on the craft. And yet the best reader can write terrible books again and again. Maybe reading those books is penance for an author’s own bad writing. Maybe there’s a price to pay for putting words into the world. You have to do time for the trade you love. At least let that time be spent on the beach.

A tribute to reading

Bookforum’s links are amazing

It’s like they were written specifically for me. In the past 24 hours, Bookforum’s links range from interviews about politics with Playboy Bunnies to a comparison of Nietzsche and Derrida to a defense of rom-com fiction to an interview with Jhumpa Lahiri to an analysis of Lil Wayne’s new rap album. And they do that every damn day. While the Bookforum people have already scoured the internet for the most transfixing news in the world, I’m still chewing on my morning toothbrush and trying to figure out what the headless people in my dream signify. But because Bookforum knows me so well, they will probably link to my personal dream diary tomorrow. Those people either employ some extremely weak or some extremely powerful search engines; they can somehow access my whole brain.

”Well, you were a drug addict, but did you kill anybody?”

Kate Ward of Entertainment Weekly compiled a list of recent memoirs organized by subject. The list is hardly exhaustive, but it gives you a good taste of what it means to be human. Being human means accomplishing something that can easily translate into a clever book title.

I’m not going to write a memoir because then I’d be self-conscious about regaling people at dinner parties with the same stories. I’d say, “One time, when I was nine, I saw a coffee cup like this, except it was a little different.” And everyone would say, “That is a riveting story, but you cover it in chapter two.”

Last week’s news for today’s young Americans

David Sedaris wrote a new book of essays. In the days before bloggers got book deals, Dave Secretary told funny stories on the internet. What are the rest of us doing? According to the Times, we’re eating gay fruit. Too bad J.D. Salinger’s girlfriend was only allowed one berry a day. Salman Rushdie let his girlfriend eat all she wanted, then she dumped him and made a career out of food. But I’ll still be the meat in a Rushdie/Martin Amis sandwich.

My main dudes Rushdie and Amis

Libertarian paternalism is the doctrine of mildly manipulating people to make wise decisions. So if you paint a fly in a urinal, men will improve their aim. If you narrow the space between the yellow lines, people will slow their cars around bends in the road. So far it seems that Thaler and Sunstein (the philosophy’s authors) are using their powers for good and not evil. But this could all change with the right influential touches. See Richard Ross’s photos from “The Architecture of Authority.” Just throw some blankets over the windows and pave over the carpet, and you’ve got yourself a prison riot.

Everyone take a moment to appreciate Cabinet Magazine online. See “Days I’ve Been Alive Represented by Dots” by Ron Lent. I want to see inside those dots! See “Vasectomania, and Other Cures for Sloth.” As long as we’re curing sloth, here’s “The Web Habits of Highly Effective People,” featuring the ultra-productive Maud Newton.

Did you know that “less than 5% of the artists in the modern art sections are women, but 85% of the nudes are female“? So ladies, it might be easier to get your bare butt into the Met than into Playboy. This is no time to give up on getting naked. Speaking of art, artists and art critics at Minnesota’s The Rake have teamed up to form The Vicious Circle. The Circle’s blog seeks to bridge the acrimonious divide between creators and creative critics. This will be especially interesting if you happen to live in Minneapolis, and I know that some of you do. What’s the weather doing over there? How’s the local sports team?

Old people: what are they good for? This geriatric MD believes “older people are the healthiest people on the planet.” Plus they’re far more adaptable than young people. Plus their legs grow back when you cut them off! Or at least that’s what my grandmother has been telling us since the surgery.

Lastly, watch how negative space can create poetry. Ponder what this means for art, and for the world, and for the cereal box on your kitchen counter. “whole grain/sun-sweetened/high blood pressure/www.kashi.com.” This is harder than it looks.

 

Woman’s search for meaning during her 10-year high school reunion

This week I started reading Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl. I also attended my 10-year high school reunion. Initially these two events appeared to have nothing in common. Frankl survived internment at multiple concentration camps, including Auschwitz, during World War II, whereas I spent my tenth grade year at an alternative high school that tutored children in self-expression, basket weaving, and pot smoking. Whereas Frankl had to endure starvation, the threat of gas chambers, and a constant assault on his human dignity, we students had to free-write in our journals for 15 minutes a day, hold yoga poses, and drive to Taco Bell for lunch.

But the more I thought about it, the more I could apply Frankl’s wisdom to my own experience of high school, and to that of reuniting with high school friends ten years after graduation.

Man’s Search for Meaning stresses the psychological freedom of the individual. We possess the unique ability to choose how we interpret our lives and our environment. We can find meaning in the most painful of circumstances, and that meaning can sustain us. Frankl tells a story of walking to a work site at the concentration camp, focusing his attention on his hunger, his foot sores, his brutal foreman, the freezing wind. Suddenly he becomes aware of how “trivial” these thoughts are.

I forced my thoughts to turn to another subject. Suddenly I saw myself standing on the platform of a. . . lecture room. . . .I was giving a lecture on the psychology of the concentration camp! All that oppressed me at that moment became objective, seen and described from the remote viewpoint of science. By this method I succeeded somehow in rising above the situation, above the sufferings of the moment, and I observed them as if they were already of the past. Both I and my troubles became the object of an interesting psychoscientific study undertaken by myself. What does Spinoza say in his Ethics?. . . .”Emotion, which is suffering, ceases to be suffering as soon as we form a clear and precise picture of it.”

The message is that we can transcend our daily troubles, even if those troubles are the incomparable atrocities of a concentration camp. We are blessed with the resources to rise above our own lives. The book’s thesis reminded me of a commencement speech given by David Foster Wallace at Kenyon in 2005.

. . .learning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience. Because if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed.

Wallace uses the example of concluding a long day at work by first getting stuck in traffic, then getting trapped in a long line at the grocery store, then being treated like a nonentity by the check-out girl, and essentially being annoyed with the world and everyone in it. But he challenges this interpretation of reality:

It will actually be within your power to experience a crowded, hot, slow, consumer-hell type situation as not only meaningful, but sacred, on fire with the same force that made the stars: love, fellowship, the mystical oneness of all things deep down.

Not that that mystical stuff is necessarily true. The only thing that’s capital-T True is that you get to decide how you’re gonna try to see it.

This, I submit, is the freedom of a real education, of learning how to be well-adjusted. You get to consciously decide what has meaning and what doesn’t.

[Read the whole piece, by the way. It’s not Jon Stewart’s 2004 commencement address to William & Mary, but it might change your life.]

So last night I sat at the bar with all these high school kids who are now bona fide grown-ups, but we’re still talking about mostly the same stuff, and we’re still smoking the same brands of cigarettes, and we still look basically the same as we did ten years ago even though there’s a pregnancy or some swelling here and there, and I thought, “I am happy.” And that’s the last thing I would have thought when hanging out with the same people in high school. Not because there was anything wrong with them, but because I was so self-conscious and pitiful due to my own myopic interpretation of life.

And maybe it’s because I now have a novel and a nice boyfriend, and maybe it’s because I’m heavily medicated, and maybe it’s because I’d been drinking the whole day of the reunion, but I also submit that life gets better, even if it doesn’t actually get better. The same exact life can feel good, whereas once it felt bad. So remember that, you down-and-out high school graduates with your unmarketable basket weaving skills. One day ten years will have gone by, but they won’t actually have gone by.

10 tips for dating a writer

1. Try not to speak in sound bytes, because they will be stolen.

2. Would you interrupt a supercomputer when it’s cracking a code? Would you interrupt a jumbo jet when it’s refueling? Then don’t interrupt a writer when she or he is napping.

3. Sometimes it seems like your writer boyfriend or girlfriend doesn’t do anything during the day. It’s like suddenly spending five hours at a coffee shop isn’t as intrinsically worthwhile as performing heart surgery. But you know what? Those people whose lives were saved on the operating table will eventually die of old age, but the writer’s blog entry will live forever online. At least until link rot sets in.

4. An unpublished writer is still a writer. Every rich and famous author was once a wannabe. Keep that in mind the next time the rent check bounces.

5. Only writing well and honestly can make your significant other truly happy. It’s nothing you did wrong. Words mean more than love to the writer. Words are love. But lucky for you, your writer will keep trying to put her love into words.

6. If you guys have a fight, it’s going to be transcribed into prose, and like it or not, the kids will probably read it one day. If you guys have sex, yikes. I hope you fare better than you did in the fight.

7. Make sure you fall in love with both the person and with the person’s alter ego who ceaselessly translates that life into prose. The two are equally important, and they are different. But you can’t have one without the other. You have to love the girl’s poetry, and you have to love the girl who makes fun of her poetry. It’s a tough job, but someone has to pay the writer’s bills.

8. Is it pretension, or is it creative license? Is it entitlement, or is it art? Are you dating the best writer in the world, or the biggest asshole in the world? Be willing to repress these questions if you date a writer.

9. Be honest with yourself. You’d probably be happier with a 9-5 bank teller who brings home a steady salary instead of an unemployed writer who brings home crumpled-up paper and mood swings. But the writer you love would probably be happier with a billionaire patron who asks no questions. So count your blessings.

10. Please excuse the occasional suspension of reality. Sometimes your loved one’s life doesn’t make sense until it’s written down. If the writer needs to delay the resolution of an argument for a year in order to write a novel that will prove she was right all along, just be patient. If you were a writer, you could also be right all the time. But you chose to pursue more challenging goals – like loving a writer. Just pray that one day this will all pay off in book royalties. At the very least you’ll be featured in the acknowledgments.

The VQR’s sloppy seconds plus a clubhouse grand opening

Whenever I write a post for the Virginia Quarterly Review, a little voice in my head tells me that I’m neglecting my personal blog. So I come here to write, but then I realize that I blew my whole wad on the VQR. So I try to buy back my post, but the VQR is like, “No way. We love this post like our own child. Not even for a million dollars.” So I put away my million dollar bill, sigh deeply, and then pull something out of my butt to blog about on Onestarwatt.

Taser parties = “a growing US trend” according to the BBC. What else do the English think we do over here? First we’re “throwing tea” into the Boston Harbor, then we’re “invading Iraq” for no reason, then we’re listening to “rap music” and eating “McDonalds,” and now we’re apparently tasering each other Sex-and-the-City-style over martinis. Okay, England. You finally got us. Next thing you know we’ll have stars and stripes on our flag.

Telephonic sheep.

Caller: Hi, I’m calling for a sheep.

Sheep: This is a sheep.

The Writer House opens in Charlottesville! I am excited about joining a writing clubhouse situated next to the best bagel shop in town (coincidence?). Don’t worry, John Grisham. Someone will eventually tell you the clubhouse’s secret password.

Four Must-Read Books for Aspiring Writers, according to Chris Higgins at Mental Floss. More recommendations in the comment section. Incidentally, here are four must-write books for aspiring writers: 1) your first novel, 2) your second novel, 3) your third novel, and finally 4) your how-to book about writing.

That’s all I got. If you’re looking for me, I’ll be in the clubhouse. No poets allowed!

“I have written 300 books with this finger”

Even though I skipped R.L. Stine and went straight to Stephen King before I cut out the middlemen and just started murdering cheerleaders myself, it sounds like Stine gives good tea.

The death of the book does not apply to fit people

Yesterday in the gym locker room I eavesdropped on a woman talking to her workout buddy. She said that she’d done her cardio on the standing bicycle instead of on the treadmill because she was nearing the end of a great novel and she couldn’t read comfortably while walking or running. So to all the critics who rue “the death of the book,” suck on that. I don’t know what you’re reading or not reading, but fit naked ladies in locker rooms still care about great literature.

And now I will be kicked out of my gym for blogging about private locker room moments.