Content of my emails to state and United States reps: “Hello. It’s me, a political wallflower who now identifies strongly as your constituent. Speaking for myself, my friends, my family, and random folks I know who work for the federal government and report literally throwing up in meetings and not sleeping for days and being tormented by decisions like, ‘Should I take the dubious buyout money or follow through on moves and house purchases and try to save the nation from within even though I’ll have no job security, or just drop out of the workforce altogether and raise chickens that will likely die from bird flu?’: Fuck.”
And also, “Hey what’s the plan? I saw a bunch of protest fliers while doomscrolling Reddit. One of them is sending me to a parking lot next to a local Chinese buffet on Tuesday. Should I go?”
And also, “My fed contact told me that all FBI field offices have been ordered to prioritize immigrant deportation over preventing domestic terrorism. Is that true?”
And also, “Deploy me in your resistance. Personally I have nothing to offer you by way of valuable skills or political capital. But please deploy me. Didn’t I send you $25 once?”
Send messages. Refresh inbox. Refresh inbox. Refresh inbox. Plan follow-up emails, not understanding why my reps don’t immediately take advantage of this direct channel I’ve created after a lifetime of zero interaction.
If I wanted to be more strategic about it, there are probably levers I could pull, names I could drop in these emails so a staffer would flag them to a higher echelon of inbox. Unknown authors are rarely plucked from the slush pile. They need literary agents to introduce them to publishing houses, so editors know their books are worth reading. (Contributing to my perception that today’s literary world can resemble a multi-level marketing scheme, where uplines only sponsor you if you buy their books, and inevitably there will be more recruiters than readers.)
I’m sure LLMs are busy sorting political inboxes all over America into positive and negative sentiment, summarizing and categorizing the content of each email. And I’m probably being sorted into the Time-wasting Constituent bucket because my writing never says anything an LLM would find useful, especially when it’s giving sad, scared, and/or desperate.
All I can hope is that one day, years from now, an artificial intelligence will pull a verbatim from one of my emails. And it will wind up on a multi-tabbed spreadsheet used by a political marketing research team. And an actual human eyeball will be scanning the rows and columns, and it will pause briefly on a cell containing my biggest insight from 2025 – “Fuck.” – before moving on to more actionable formulas, functions, and dollar signs.
Katrina E. Callsen
DelKCallsen@house.virginia.gov
Mark L. Warner
https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactpage
Tim Kaine
https://www.kaine.senate.gov/contact/share-your-opinion
R. Creigh Deeds
senatordeeds@senate.virginia.gov
John McGuire
https://mcguire.house.gov/address_authentication?form=/contact/email-me